They did not want more to substitute the President of the Province of Are Peter. They wanted, yes, to choose the President of the Republic. The fight would be of the soldiers of the Republican Army of the Rio Grande. It was not more the fight of rebels, but a war of republican army against imperial army. The flag was not more imperial the green-yellow one and they did not fight for recognition, but for the sovereignty of its country. In day 12, the Act of Declaration of Independence in which was cultivated they declared not to embainhar the swords, and to spill the blood all, before retroceding of the principles politicians. In 6 of November of 1836, the voting in the Chamber of Piratini for President of the River Republic was legalized. Exactly not being present, Blessed Gonalves won with Jose Gomes de Vasconcelos vice-presidente.&#039 Garden as first; ' Question: If the River Republic had invigorated, what it would have been of Brazil without the personalities or institutions of the Paran, Santa Catarina and Rio Grande Do Sul, the example of Ana Rickmann, Berenice Azambuja, Brito Jnior, Agricultural Canal, Dunga, Elis Regina, Emilio Mdici, I make bristle Verssimo, Geisel Ernest, Esperidio Amin, EUCATUR, Gaucho of the Border, Getlio Vargas, Gisele Bndchen, Graziela Massafera, Gustavo Krtner, Itaipu, Goulart Joo, Leonel Brizola, Felipo, Luiz Fernando Verssimo, Negrinho of the Pasturing, Nelson Gonalves, Peter Simon, Placid of I castrate, Agricultural Radio and TV, Robert Requio, Ronaldinho Gaucho, Teixeirinha, UNIMED, Werner Schunneman, Xuxa, therefore that they are part of our History, but they would not be Brazilian or Brazilian! II? GERMANS IN BRAZIL ' ' For the necessity of the workmanship hand, in 1822, in the transistion of the process of release of the independence of Brazil, D. Peter offered tickets, 78 annual hectares of land, one hundred and sixty kings and certain amount of oxen, cows, horses, pigs and hens for each person of each family of the Europe interested in the Brazilian settling.

He deals with to the space, geography, the cultural and linguistic units as well as of the ethnic groups. He tries to justify the fragilities of the African continent: precarious opening for the exterior, great cultural isolation, absence of previous cultural goods to the contact with the Europeans, ground poor and barren climate. It deals with to century VII, the Islamic expansion and some littoral empires, showing great unfamiliarity of the interior. With reason or not, Braudel affirms that it did not have knowledge concerning the past of Africa. Perhaps its little knowledge on this continent has favored its theoretical elaboration with these peculiarities. As well as in the Mediterranean, it suggests that the African culture if spoils from century XV, when its economy daily pay-monetary enters in contact with the dynamic developed commerce the north of the Mediterranean. The construction of its texts and the consultation of its bibliography evidence that the repertoire of the information gotten for Braudel gave account only of the slavery. It would be interesting to evaluate the quality of these information.

Braudeliana Africa enters for the History, fagocitada for its model of civilization, from century XV, when the European one comes back its look toward this continent and, of systemize form more in century XIX, with the imperialism. With partial reason it defends that Africa if benefited of the European settling, receiving cultural and material good; but also it recognizes that this brutal contact disarticulated the African culture, spoiling millenarian tribal, familiar and social structures fundamental in way of being and living of the African. Interest of the European powers was not enough to this the territorial division of Africa according to did not consider the regional especificidades of the cultures. Soon! In a briefing I capitulate is locked up the history of Africa, not faced as civilization, but yes as culture. We can in them now question the criterion of this framing, since the continent related one possesss a space with a consolidated society, comungando of a mentality, lasting and continuing in the space and the time.

When it is spoken of England thinks about the United kingdom in a general way, is necessary to desconstruir an idea that will not be fortified in century XIX with the Imperialism to think about this Great-Britain as a great empire that never dies. For more clarity and thought, follow up with Jeffrey Hayzlett and gain more knowledge.. One is about an ideological vision that is brought to think of Great-Britain, being nothing more than a construction politics. If it did not have this homogeneity in the century in century XIX, evidently it did not have in century XVII with the diverse economic and cultural conflicts inside of the island. The first one was of that if these components won the war, the weakened king already would come to lose the throne and this classroom that wants to emerge as dominant social classroom to come to substitute the proper king and to restore a new form of government. Second it was shrewdness of Cromwell in becoming to perceive the following one: England is in war and way to a crisis economic politics and, but the king has a national army that, even so he does not have financial recital to be supported, is in conflict and he assists still more the weakness; on the other hand, if the Scottish and Irishans win the war can be they to come to not only take the power in England, leading the fall of the king as bourgeois the emergent ones.

The strategy of Cromwell, that is between the Common ones, is to create an Army of New Type. One is not about one real that are on to the king to defend the State, but formed army basically for excluded that they do not possess real and taxed privileges of taxes as bourgeois and the peasants. It appears in England, century XVII, a climate of participation politics and military man. this army that granted support so that the Common ones not only had effective domnios of funds, of this capitalism that started to develop, but also of being able politician.

If they lived so well, if they had in the land what it was necessary, because they had not preserved? R: Good, it did not depend very on people, with the coming of the tourists, the caboclo saw the possibility of profits and he did not imagine the problems that this would cause, the tourist or as we called the ones that came of it are, ' ' animal of the Goiaba' ' they did not have the same linking with the nature, perhaps for not depending on it as in, then they did not give importance, did not respect nor took care of of the nature. Of this form they depredated and they destruam. It speaks on these depredations. R: Forest fires and roados in order to clean lands pra construction of its houses, same construction of a is situated near the border of more almost than inside of the sea. They hunted at the time wrong, all caboclo that if preze must know that in the summer if it cannot hunt, therefore the majority of the females are ' ' prenha' ' or dealing with the younglings, and ' ' turista' ' it did not respect this, it hunted in the summer, of this form, when killing an animal, in the certainty it was killing at least more two or three younglings. In its opinion is this the cause of the disappearance of many animals? R: I am certain that yes, how many and how many years the Matinhense hunted, without having the extinct animals, because it respected the periods, it was respected nature, of this form, all the animals had time pra if to reproduce, assuring the continuity of the species. But if it only could hunt in the winter, in the summer the caboclo passed hunger? R: here who only passes hunger has fear of work. .