Censorship is the State interference with freedom of expression. Of two German dictatorships have exercised excessively. Stop signs before padokriminellen pages, which arise on the basis of a federal law and will be organized by the Supreme police authority, represent no measure of censorship. There is no fundamental right to unimpeded access to “child pornography” sites. Also no reason right, quite State-legitimated restrictions to accept if this will protect the dignity of victims of gender-based violence.

The human dignity of the victims, however, has according to article 1 of the Basic Law constitutional. Stop signs are bypassable, tech savvy so as red lights just be run over by many. Traffic signs will therefore be abolished? The tech-savvy or the Kernpadokrimenelle will find new ways. The debate involves Internet locks but the more unbiased. The State is required to set an example and to take all measures for which there is a social consensus.

In one of the German children’s aid in June 2009 in a representative survey commissioned by TNS infratest policy research more than 90% of the population advocated the access impediment Act. It goes to Accessblocking and not to the introduction of censorship. The new simplified and shortened formula in the debate is “Delete instead of locks”. Both are right: delete as quickly as possible, and where it goes and also the locks. Dealing with uncertain or incalculable at the locks not some hypothetical. It is an instrument which is used for more than two years in other countries. UK, Sweden, Finland, Denmark or Italy have built a structure of censorship, by which troublesome content or copyright infringement be deleted, or tracks. The position of the industry is unique. It involves economic interests. It is up-to-date, hotel tax or business leaders exert their influence in politics always jets nuclear consensus. In the fight against the despicable form of Crime may not be observed. There is just the industry, which recorded the highest growth rates and the largest growth market, the responsibility for these crimes. That involves the organized resistance the interests and the money of the companies of the Internet economy, should finally be made clear in the debate and not be obscured behind censorship and false concepts of liberty and debates. Accesblocking is only a building block in the fight against Padokriminalitat on the net, no more but also no less. It would be regrettable if no power locks are introduced because of this debate only in Germany. “To repeal legislative initiatives such as the access impediment Act would be – especially in the light of the Advisory in Brussels framework for protection against sexual violence in the Internet – a step backwards and an irresponsible national single handedly. The Federal Minister of Justice is required, the law already adopted by the German Bundestag and signed by the President after a thorough examination to implement”, RA Georg Ehrmann, Chairman of the German children’s aid, on the edge of the hearing in Berlin. For questions 0160 is Georg Ehrmann, Tel. 364 56 85 available. For more information on this subject, also on our portals and company description the German children’s aid is the national children’s charity, which nationwide without government money aid projects promotes and takes position as independent lobby for children as well as on regional and federal level accompanied legislative procedure. Company contact: German child aid E.v. Georg Ehrmann ship baby d 40 d-10117 Berlin Tel: (030) 24 34 294-0 E-Mail: Web: PR contact: German child aid E.v. Julia M. Hofmann Schiffbauerdamm 40 10117 Berlin Tel: (030) 24 34 294-0 E-Mail: Web: