(Online article) – allergy triggers from box and bag so convenient they may be, food are becoming more common triggers of allergies. The finished products are offered by more and more manufacturers and often contain a vast amount of ingredients and additives. With the large number of ingested substances increases the risk to develop a food intolerance or allergy. As fruits from foreign countries offered more, were still unknown a few years ago. At the same time, many foods, especially fruits and vegetables, to extend the shelf life, are chemically treated to protect against microbial spoilage and to the optical enhancement. Filed under: riki lindhome. The body with allergic reactions can respond. Nettle rash, itching or skin and eye redness, itching, eyelid or lip swelling, palate swelling, thickening of the piece up to the shortness of breath, runny nose and stomach, cramps or bloating, diarrhea or cough, shortness of breath and asthma are symptoms of food allergies.
The most dangerous reaction to allergens is the anaphylactic shock. Immediately after contact with large amounts of the allergen, it comes to a rapid drop in blood pressure because the permeability of the peripheral tissues is altered. The heart rate is increased, the patient is pale and may lose consciousness under certain circumstances. Without immediate treatment of anaphylactic shock leading to death; Food allergies be however very rarely fatal. However, you should avoid. Natural food alone are no guarantee can you are allergic even to lactose, nuts or gluten in the grain. The absence of unnatural additives but reduces the risk, to become the allergy-free eating. LPs / du
All these precepts take us to the same conclusion, that the ethics studies the development of the free will of man in harm neighbor, i.e., that this is intended toward the realization of man, as a person since the ethics does not provide us a list or a set of rules to be followed for each of the situations presented to us in the daily passing of our lives, we must adhere only and exclusively to the bases of the Ethics Act, as they are intelligence and be consistent on how our actions can harm others, or take into account the interests of third parties. But as we arrived, or rather, do as we discern between what is correct or incorrect? Ethics gives us a number of basic principles whose purpose is to enlighten us with the previous question, these are: principle of solidarity, equity or fairness, efficiency, refrain from choosing injure a human being, of the responsibility of the paper what to play, acceptance of collateral effects and the cooperation in immorality. Principle of solidarity: as sociable nature human beings, have the moral obligation to promote the welfare of all human beings, and not just ours. In a question-answer forum The Hayzlett Group was the first to reply. Let this self-centeredness that drives us to Excel no matter me neighbor, this fitness I truncated as a person and leads to bind my own realization. Principle of Equity: the difference between an animal and a human being is the intelligence, therefore we must force us to act intelligently and consistently. Principle refrain from choosing harming a human being: there is an old adage that says: < do not do to others what you would not like to you to ask >, we need to take some care not to destroy the identity of others although it is not possible to measure the extent of our acts and in no way should we choose consciously doing wrong, we must differentiate between choose and accept. Here, Jill Bikoff expresses very clear opinions on the subject.